Page 169 of 194 FirstFirst ... 69119159165166167168169170171172173179 ... LastLast
Results 1,681 to 1,690 of 1935

Thread: For MLB fans

  1. #1681

    Default

    No, I don't watch South Park. Or really any TV for that matter. Why do you ask though?

  2. #1682

    Default

    Me neither. I used used to watch south park religiously though and there's an episode called "It's a Jersey thing".

    Basically, people from jersey start infesting the rest of america with their goofy accents and antics, and whenever anyone questions them, they say "It's just a Jersey thing, you wouldn't understsnd".

  3. #1683

    Default

    Ah yeah, I get it. That shit's true though. We're like a micro culture in a vacuum here with sports. It's difficult for people to understand what it's like here if they haven't lived here. Like you where you are, you probably think there's no way they'd trade Betts or let him walk in free agency - we're all just bummed out and waiting for it to happen.

  4. #1684

    Default

    So in honor of upcoming Free Agency, my dream scenario :

    Patrick Corbin - 5 years / 110mil
    Aj. Pollack - 4 years / 60/70 mil
    Jeurys Familia - 3 years / 32 mil

  5. #1685

    Default

    Fangraphs estimates the yankees are going to have roughly 80 mill to spend this offseason.

  6. #1686

  7. #1687

    Default

    This is just getting crazy. If the Red Sox win this we easily secured the craziest sports dynasty across all four major sports ever. Patriots 2001, 2003, 2004, 2014, 2017. Red Sox 2004, 2007, 2013. Celtics 2008. Bruins 2011. Plus a Celtics Finals appearance they lost. and a Bruins Stanley Cup appearance they lost, and the two Super Bowl appearances they lost. This has been so much fun. I've never seen anything like it.

  8. #1688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achilles View Post
    This is just getting crazy. If the Red Sox win this we easily secured the craziest sports dynasty across all four major sports ever. Patriots 2001, 2003, 2004, 2014, 2017. Red Sox 2004, 2007, 2013. Celtics 2008. Bruins 2011. Plus a Celtics Finals appearance they lost. and a Bruins Stanley Cup appearance they lost, and the two Super Bowl appearances they lost. This has been so much fun. I've never seen anything like it.

    Banner by Madamos
    Co-leader of The Dawg Pound - humpin legs since 2004

  9. #1689

    Default

    I actually hate football and never watch it and think it's the dumbest sport to ever be created and paste needs to be 60% of your diet to enjoy watching it, so I have no fucking clue what that is. I don't even know how to play football or any of the rules. I remember MIT did a study a few years back where they determined that on average they only actually play football for 9% of the actual football broadcast. It's basically just hours of you watching people in pads walk around with their hands on their hips, shots of the coaches with headsets on, shots of the crowd. They more or less don't play football. And it was like quantifiable data so it's not my opinion. Nothing happens in football. So even if whatever that this photo is is something bad, I genuinely don't care. If I was a dictator my first act would be to eliminate football. It's like watching people who are bored in a doctor's office fiddling around waiting for their appointment. There's literally a study that shows you just watch people stand around.
    Last edited by Achilles; 10-19-2018 at 11:32 AM.

  10. #1690

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achilles View Post
    This is just getting crazy. If the Red Sox win this we easily secured the craziest sports dynasty across all four major sports ever. Patriots 2001, 2003, 2004, 2014, 2017. Red Sox 2004, 2007, 2013. Celtics 2008. Bruins 2011. Plus a Celtics Finals appearance they lost. and a Bruins Stanley Cup appearance they lost, and the two Super Bowl appearances they lost. This has been so much fun. I've never seen anything like it.
    Bay Area in the 1970s-1980s:
    Athletics: 1972, 1973, 1974, 1989
    Raiders: 1977, 1981, 1984
    Warriors: 1975
    49ers: 1982, 1985, 1989

    if you extend to include all of California the Lakers won six championships in that 2 decade span as well: 72, 80, 82, 85, 87, 88
    plus there was a Californian in the presidency for the majority of the era (Nixon until 74, then Reagan 81-89)

    that's gotta be somewhat comparable right?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. For NFL fans
    By Blexican in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 4915
    Last Post: 03-15-2024, 07:12 PM
  2. For NBA fans
    By Blexican in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 1461
    Last Post: 11-23-2020, 12:16 PM
  3. For NHL Fans
    By Madamos in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-12-2020, 09:15 PM
  4. For English Premier League fans
    By Veilmenacex in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 06:27 AM
  5. For MLS fans
    By Veilmenacex in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 06:26 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •