Page 162 of 193 FirstFirst ... 62112152158159160161162163164165166172 ... LastLast
Results 1,611 to 1,620 of 1935

Thread: For MLB fans

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Baseball stadiums are almost all going that route. I think its kinda nice to have the stadium rejuvenated and modernized. New generations of fans want craft beers, local/gourmet restaurants, daycare and various other family activities in the stadium. The days where you go to a stadium with your family to simply watch a baseball game are gone, so you're seeing stadiums add things like this to the stadiums to draw more casual fans and families.

    The blue jays ownership actually has the most money in baseball if we look at the networth of the rogers family (much more then John Henry or Hal Steinbrenner) and there exists a laundry list of things that need to be improved on the stadium but ownership simply refuses to budge on.

    This ownership bought the team in 1995 for pennies proceeded to destroy the team that had just won 2 world series back to back and dominate most of the 1980s. From their they continually missed the playoffs for 20+ years and swiftly undid the team after making the playoffs for 2 measly years in 2015 and 16

    In 2005, Rogers purchased the Skydome renamed it the Rogers centre, and have not made any notable renovations or refurbishments since then. They've sold out to maximize profits at almost every possible chance, they're in the process of gutting the team's payroll and are butting heads with our team president because he's trying to get them to spend money on needed stadium renovations and refurbishments. The stadium is (I believe) one of if not the oldest stadiums in baseball not to have undergone any serious renovations, and their are whispers that theyre looking to sell the team. Makes sense, because the estimated minimum reno costs for the stadium are in excess of 500 million dollars... so we'll see what happens to the team. It would be absolutely criminal of rogers to sell the team at this time, but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

    Here are two interesting articles about stadium fan experiences.

    https://www.reviewtrackers.com/fan-s...ball-stadiums/

    https://www.fangraphs.com/tht/introd...erience-index/

  2. #2

    Default

    What? The Rogers Centre was built in 1989. It's far from the oldest stadium in baseball. It's also the ugliest stadium in baseball in my opinion.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achilles View Post
    What? The Rogers Centre was built in 1989. It's far from the oldest stadium in baseball. It's also the ugliest stadium in baseball in my opinion.
    You have a really bad habit of not reading people's posts all the way through and starting an argument based off of something they didn't say.

    Spencer said it's one of the "oldest stadiums in baseball not to have undergone any serious renovations." That's a word-for-word quote from his post. Rogers Centre is currently the 7th oldest stadium in MLB, and he's probably right about it being the only one of the older stadium not to have undergone serious renovations. Kauffman Stadium went through some big renovations in 2006 to modernize it and increase fan experience. Fenway has had improvements since 2000 (like the Green Monster seats and some of the grandstand areas), Wrigley has been going through some cosmetic improvements the last few years, the Dodgers have spent hundreds of millions to build shops and restaurants around the stadium and improve entrances, etc. I think the only thing Rogers Centre got was a new scoreboard over the years.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KBHoleN1 View Post
    You have a really bad habit of not reading people's posts all the way through and starting an argument based off of something they didn't say.

    Spencer said it's one of the "oldest stadiums in baseball not to have undergone any serious renovations." That's a word-for-word quote from his post. Rogers Centre is currently the 7th oldest stadium in MLB, and he's probably right about it being the only one of the older stadium not to have undergone serious renovations. Kauffman Stadium went through some big renovations in 2006 to modernize it and increase fan experience. Fenway has had improvements since 2000 (like the Green Monster seats and some of the grandstand areas), Wrigley has been going through some cosmetic improvements the last few years, the Dodgers have spent hundreds of millions to build shops and restaurants around the stadium and improve entrances, etc. I think the only thing Rogers Centre got was a new scoreboard over the years.
    My bad, I did misread it. I wasn't starting an argument, I was asking a question about what he said. I hope it's obvious I'm an easy going dude.

    Yeah, Fenway is unrecognizable to me now. It's unreal how different it is now. They started changing it around the early 2000s.

  5. #5

    Default

    Oldest in baseball that hasnt been refurbished or upgraded in any way. It is exactly the same as it was back then besides general maintenance and repairs.

    Fenway has seen many upgrades over the years and so has wrigley.

    In terms of oldest stadiums in general, 1989 actually is one of the older stadiums in baseball.

  6. #6

    Default

    I totally agree it is the ugliest stadium in baseball. It was designed to be useful moreso then architecturally pretty. It needs to be bulldozed tho.

  7. #7

    Default

    what
    As is from 1965 and was redone "" before the Raiders left Oakland for LA and the "redone" was adding Mount Davis which the As don't use. I'd be surprised as shit if Oakland Coliseum isn't the most outdated in baseball (or football).

  8. #8

    Default

    Honestly didnt view it as him trying to start an argument with me. Im cool explaining myself.

    That being said, KB, you're a badass and your post made me very happy. I had no idea you knew as much about this kinda stuff as I do. It makes me feel like less of a baseball nut job.

  9. #9

    Default

    @hulky ya O.co is hilariously bad too. Check the articles I posted.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spencer 555 View Post
    @hulky ya O.co is hilariously bad too. Check the articles I posted.
    it is hilariously bad, but so much fun and so cheap compared to other high end pro sports. It's like MLS soccer cheap (if not more so).

    kinda funny the second worst experience from your link was Tropicana which I thought was worse (imo). I've been to Rays As and Giants. Giants is amazing and luxurious and I assume thats what most are. As feels like baseball. Rays was like "okay I was gifted these tickets and it's aight".

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. For NFL fans
    By Blexican in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 4917
    Last Post: 04-16-2024, 06:51 PM
  2. For NBA fans
    By Blexican in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 1461
    Last Post: 11-23-2020, 12:16 PM
  3. For NHL Fans
    By Madamos in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-12-2020, 09:15 PM
  4. For English Premier League fans
    By Veilmenacex in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 06:27 AM
  5. For MLS fans
    By Veilmenacex in forum Sports Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 06:26 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •